1. Background
2. Initial response to the Site
3. Objectives
4. Assumptions for building a design proposal
5. Scenarios and Simulation results
6. Design Proposal
7. Program

8. site images ..

~

9.  Location Map
10. Site Plan
11. Sections

Background

 

Ahmedabad

 

CTM

 

CTM (Gate)

 

Unlined Canal

 

Amraiwadi

 

  Kharicut, which lies on the eastern side of Ahmedabad city, an extension from the river Khari, was essentially built for supporting irrigation facilities for villages like Nikol, Odhav, Vatva, Ramol, etc. It also provides an artificial water recharge system for almost all the villages around it. But due to urban sprawl of the city, factories started lining up along the edge of the canal. After since, there have been recurring allegations that these factories dump pollutants in the canal, which can be spotted clearly (except monsoon). Along with the factories, that dump the waste into the canal there has been uncontrolled housing development, parallel to the factories, also dump their waste into canal and few of them uses soak pits for drainage.

 

  Following the judgment by the court the industrial units were ordered to dump waste, that could not be completely treated within their own premises, at appropriate collective dumping site i.e. respective GIDC’S CETP (Common Effluent Treatment Plant). The regulation was passed to enable factories, which could not afford a secondary level treatment unit within their premises and had to look for different places to dump the wastes.

 

  Some units found guilty were penalized and the amount was to be used for clearing the waste that is already dumped into Kharicut. Even with the law in place the authorities are unable to stop the industrial units from dumping wastes into the canal.

 

  The problem of pollution in the canal has been realized by agencies like the GPCB, Irrigation Dept., as well by Planners. It might get solved in future but by covering the canal, so that waste can be dumped into the canal without being noticed, and the canal might get converted to a sewer, which is what it is today, an open type.

 

The canal, which stretches along the city, is used for nothing more than a dumpsite.

 


Initial response to the Site

 

·         To bring active as well as responsible agencies to the site,.

·         Diffusing concentration in order to open areas to explore i.e. not taking the market as the only governing force, but also assign areas for governing/regulatory agencies.

·         The program might not be static with respect to site. It might evolve overtime considering the requirements as per later development. But to start with it is important to deploy agencies that would monitor the pollution of the canal and take necessary actions.

·         Consider  the outline for extension due to future developments.

·         To bring welfare agencies together at a point where they could ‘interact’.

·         Using the built feature of canal as a basis for design..

·         Responses to similar features within the city. For example, the site has similar characteristics as Sabarmati river.

·         Questioning the processes by which demarcations happen within a given context - city-outskirts,  majur-gam, Asarwa, Bapunagar, and Nikol etc.

·         To make active and responsible mechanisms to percolate into every part of the city.

·          User activity could be included as per site - School, Health Center, Dispensary / Hospital, Housing, Police Station, Shopping Center, Public Park, Restaurants / Food Places, Agriculture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 






Objectives

 

 

1.  To identify control points, along the stretch of Kharicut, wherein, responsible agencies and monitoring units will be placed.

 

2.  To bring at one place - active as well as responsible agencies, finding common and shared functions between them and diffusing them with user-activity.

 

  The proposal does not look into the development of Kharicut in form of layers but rather proposes a continuous intervention that would focus on an urgent and important issue.

 


Assumptions for building a design proposal

 

Assumption A.1

Assumption A.2

 

Assumption B.1

 

Assumption B.2

 

 

A.      Assuming that the canal is not used for irrigation anymore

 

  1. Re-use the stretch as linear infrastructure such as, road, drainage, network etc. (this would require reworking of irrigation methods)

 

  1. The canal is reclaimed for development purposes, e.g. commercial area, green area, etc.

 

  B. Assuming that the canal is perennial

 

1.       The canal is covered,

o        the canal is inaccessible to public

o        it stops waste from being dumped into the canal. (this would sure reduce the amount of waste dumped in the canal but the actual problem of villages, where the canal is not lined, remains)

 

2.       The canal is open

o        edges of the canal need to be developed such that it is accessible to the public

o        the canal will be prone to dumping of wastes

o        water, in the canal, requires to be completely or partially filtered before it flows into fields. (this would also require a secondary system that allows for filtering / treating of the water)

 

  The proposal takes into account Assumptions B.1 and B.2, and includes it into the program as:

 

  B.1 -  Monitoring Units

  • Placed over the canal (as crossovers) to keep a check on amount of waste.
  • Includes laboratories and administrative offices, as well as Govt. offices concerning pollution.

  B.2 -  ISWMP Institute

  • Placed along the canal to create edge conditions.
  • Includes Govt., Non-Govt., Ind. Assoc. offices, public amenities, research cell and library.

 


Scenarios and Simulation results

 

  The results in table 1 are supported by Research Thesis of students of School of Planning, who have conducted simulations with possible variations in existing conditions, and experiments concerning the state of the canal.

                                                                    

                                                                                                 Note: Fresh water input at present is Rain, as Khari river is a rain fed river

                                                                                 

Table 1: A summary of possible variations within existing situations

 

 

 


Design Proposal

  

Study 1 - [Table 1] Two specific conditions for the program to work with (Scenarios 3, 4). Out of which the program emphasizes the condition in Scenario 4, where there are waste inputs from all three  GIDCs and a need for freshwater input.

 

  Suggested alternatives for treatment/discharge methods (in order of preference)

      1. Dilution by rainwater discharge

      2. Treatment for agriculture use

      3. Treatment at AMC Plant

      4. Treatment for industrial use

 

Study 2 - Suggested institutional structure: An ISWMP Institute be brought under one institutional body, comprising of representatives from GPCB, AMC, and Industries, including a Research Cell and public utilities.

 

  The project proposes treatment and monitoring units along the stretch of Kharicut canal. Major nodes for monitoring and dilution units are GIDC Naroda and Odhav. Dilution units consist of water storages. The water supplied to these units could be from existing water-pumping stations or by making new storage units, which could also serve as a public place for that area. Main filtration unit is placed at Vatva where from the unlined portion of the canal starts and is dispersed  into the fields and residential areas around Hansol, Vinzol, etc. The unit provides treatment of chemicals and solid waste.


  The monitoring units consist of laboratories and GPCB offices. They are placed along the stretch with appropriate public amenities for the specific locality. Odhav is considered the center of the Kharicut canal and hence an ISWMP Institute comprising of Government, Non-Government, Industrial Associations and Public-amenities is placed there to demonstrate the program. A research unit focusing alternative methods of treatment, waste minimization and production efficiency of industries around GIDC and a library support these.


Sources:

Study (1) Industrial Waste, GIDC Vatva.  Dinesh. School of Planning thesis

Study (2). Naroda, Odhav and Vatva. Sahu School of Planning thesis

 


Program

Land Use: Odhav

Odhav: Factories

 

Odhav: Housing

  • Monitoring Unit
    1. Offices                                                      60sqm
    2. Services                                                 30sqm
    3. Laboratories                                      150sqm

·         Laboratories / Sensing Unit

·         Administration and Services

                - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

       ISWMP Institute

  • Government:
    1. Offices for Individuals                          90sqm
    2. Meeting rooms                                     120sqm
    3. Services                                                 30sqm

·         Water Supply and Sewerage Department

·         Gujarat Pollution Control Board

  • Non-government
    1. Offices                                                      80sqm
    2. Classrooms/Workshop Space             80sqm
    3. Seminar Hall                                          75sqm
    4. Services                                                 30sqm

·         Industrial Associations

·         NGO working in the locality (issues concerning industrial safety, women and child care, education etc.)

  • Public
    1. Public Utility                                       100sqm
    2. Multipurpose Hall                              100sqm                                 
    3. Library                                                    60sqm
    4. Services                                                 30sqm

·         Dispensary (Health Center supported by the Research Unit)

·         Exhibition / Notification

·         Legal center (supported by NG)

  • Sub-parts of the institute
    1. Congregation Space                          150sqm
    2. Canteen                                               120sqm   
    3. Exhibition / Notification                 100sqm
    4. Parking                

·         Research and Development

·         Parking Space